RE: trump announces his bid for reelection!
June 19, 2019 at 10:05 am
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2019 at 10:13 am by Drich.)
(June 18, 2019 at 5:00 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: Hopefully he ran it by Putin firstare you stuck in 2016?
The mueller report shows the only people dealing with russia was Clinton's team buying the false dossier that kicked off the whole russia investigation.
The sum total of tumps involvement with russia was to compliment putin enough to bait you nit wits into thinking he is doing something he was not in order for your politicians to double down and completely commit into bring and manufacturing false evidence to try and get trump impeached. (IE the false russian dossier that kicked off the muller investigation) for what reason? to drain the swamp! To put people in politics who do things illegally like clinton comby and the rest out of their job and quit possibly in jAil!
(June 18, 2019 at 5:16 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: 1. No, drawing large crowds does not mean you will remain in power. While the sort of people who attend rallies are likely to vote, not all likely voters attend rallies.dumbest thing I ever heard. do you have an example of a candidate who drew 20,000+ people to an event consistently and lost the election to a person who struggled to bring out 200 people? Of course you don't! why? because if a man or woman is willing to wait hours if not days in a line over 2 miles long to get in to see a man speak dozens of miles if not hundreds of miles away... why who they not then turn out to vote for the same man a few miles away with a max hour wait time if it is not an in and out process?
Quote:2. Precisely my point. The size of a crowd that attends a political rally has absolutely nothing to do with that individual's qualities as a leader. It was stupid of you to compare the size of Trump's crowd to Biden's. Trump is a boob. If he draws ten million people to a rally, he's still a boob. If he draws just two people and a choleric dog, the boobosity remains intact.there is no discernable logic here to refute... this is just your personal blather to which you are entitled to. I won't smash it for the sake of doing so.