RE: trump announces his bid for reelection!
June 20, 2019 at 2:19 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2019 at 2:22 pm by Deesse23.)
This thread has reached the level of absurdity any thread with Drich involved inevitably leads to.
#1 Socialism, communism and nazism
Anyone who knows anything about political ideology knows that socialism is part of the Communist ideology. Socialism is a state of society prior to communism. Now, from a nazi perspective coomunism was originated and controlled by the jews, the scape goats of nazi ideology. No sane nazi would embrace socialism, the intellectual spawn of the evil jews.
What the nazis tried to offer is some common benefits for their citizens, benefits that are in accordance with what every person with at least some degree of empathy would embrace. Having (good) ideas that are also embraced by socialists doesnt make you one. It also doenst make you a decent person (the nazis werent, with or without constructing the autobahn) It only shows that you may have empathy, like socialists. In case of the nazis it was less empathy but part of the social darwinism they were committed to.
#2
This is, by all standards utterly absurd. Free healthcare? Free home? Free car? Are you kidding? The car you are most probably talking about is the VW Käfer, originally started as a KdF Design, but stopped during the war.
It wasnt intended to be free but affordable, like the Volksempfänger. If you consider offering an affordable car to Joe Average to be socialist, then by all means Henry Ford was a socialist.
Free healthcare? Nope, just affordable, public health care. A system we still have and which works to some extend. Public healthcare, a system that was introduced by Bismarck in the late 19th century. Was Bismarck a socialist? Do you have a clue what Bismarcks relation to socialism/socialists was?
I am writing in socialist Germany btw.
#1 Socialism, communism and nazism
Anyone who knows anything about political ideology knows that socialism is part of the Communist ideology. Socialism is a state of society prior to communism. Now, from a nazi perspective coomunism was originated and controlled by the jews, the scape goats of nazi ideology. No sane nazi would embrace socialism, the intellectual spawn of the evil jews.
What the nazis tried to offer is some common benefits for their citizens, benefits that are in accordance with what every person with at least some degree of empathy would embrace. Having (good) ideas that are also embraced by socialists doesnt make you one. It also doenst make you a decent person (the nazis werent, with or without constructing the autobahn) It only shows that you may have empathy, like socialists. In case of the nazis it was less empathy but part of the social darwinism they were committed to.
#2
Quote:don't buy into the new narrative.
There was a reason national socialist workers party took hold in germany, you need not look any further than the promises of free education, free health care a free home and car for every family
This is, by all standards utterly absurd. Free healthcare? Free home? Free car? Are you kidding? The car you are most probably talking about is the VW Käfer, originally started as a KdF Design, but stopped during the war.
It wasnt intended to be free but affordable, like the Volksempfänger. If you consider offering an affordable car to Joe Average to be socialist, then by all means Henry Ford was a socialist.
Free healthcare? Nope, just affordable, public health care. A system we still have and which works to some extend. Public healthcare, a system that was introduced by Bismarck in the late 19th century. Was Bismarck a socialist? Do you have a clue what Bismarcks relation to socialism/socialists was?
I am writing in socialist Germany btw.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
