(June 20, 2019 at 1:37 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:looseR who...(June 19, 2019 at 1:43 pm)Drich Wrote: Remember you asked for it.
The NAZI party although having socialist as part of its name was as socialist as the Queen Latifa is royal.
Because names mean less than deeds.
Lets look at the NAZI party and its actions. One of the main things it did was centralize power in one individual.
The first proper socialists arose as part of the French revolution.
This was where modern terms began by the seating arrangements in the parliament, the people who supported concentration of power in elites on the right and people advocating for a more equal society sitting on the left. Hence the terms left and right wing today.
Now obviously the idea of a fairer society is an attractive one and one that has been usurped a few times to install right regimes.
Stalinist Russia and China are examples and the ones trotted out the most by people who don't understand the complexities.
(June 19, 2019 at 1:43 pm)Drich Wrote: because one of you douche bags is using the word socialism and communism interchangeable as if he did not know the difference or there was a difference...yet here you chime in like some loose who does not understand the point of the quote you are responding to was to show a difference between communism and socialism...
What is a "loose who"
Quote:no you are writing from the uk version of socialism and nazism is not the same thing..(June 19, 2019 at 1:43 pm)Drich Wrote: So again dummy show me educate me make me out to be a fool thinking that socialism is not communism and that 60 million people did not die between germany and the USSR during WWII because on side where communist and the other where socialist!
The NAZIs were not socialists. They were an extreme right wing party that put socialist in the name to appeal to morons who wouldn't know the difference. Socialism is by definition a left wing stance NAZISM and fascism are by definition a right wing stance
Again you do not know what socialism is.
But then you do seem to be American and they have gone out of their way to lie to you.
I am writing in the socialist UK.
Here's what former nazi state of austria has to formally say as to why nazism IS indeed socialism:
https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was...talitarian
The Mises institute is the officially sanctioned by the government of austria to educate people about the austrian economy.
https://www.abc.net.au/religion/nazism-s...y/10214302
The Above is a historical look at all of the the reason we fought against socialism in WWII and why the nazi brand of socialism was the picture of it.
So let's review, I have a form nazi state's official position that nazism was socialism and I have recorded history detailed from that time that nazism was indeed socialism, and you have your nut-huh because i live in a socialist version of the uk...
look dummy, not all brands of socialism seek to do things the same way. nor to they have the same solutions when the socalism begins to fail and the leadership realise it is unsustainable.
Germany sought to maintain state power by stealing money and resources from surrounding nations and eventually the world! You guys borrow from china and pretend greece is not leading the EU to total finical ruin. lefties would never invade a neighbor and steal their resources to maintain their failed government... however nazi would does not make them any less or you any more of a socialist. As socialism is not about success but how you deal with it's ultimate collapse... do you take o the world or let your people starve and blame others.. anywhere on that spectrum you land you are still a socialist as again it is a practice in economic failure not a political correctness contest..
