trump announces his bid for reelection!

[Rev. Rye]

It should be noted that, as credible as these accusations are, he’s not likely to ever get a guilty verdict, not because of any flaws in their testimonies, but for the same reason he wasn’t charged in the Muller probe: because the DoJ point-blank refuses to indict a sitting president.

https://time.com/5573289/robert-mueller-...n-charges/

The Staute of Limitations might be another major issue. That said, just because he hasn’t had a guilty verdict doesn’t mean he’s not likely to be guilty.

Look at the case of Jimmy Savile. In life, he was one of the most beloved TV presenters in he UK. He even raised £45 million for charity. But there were always little murmurs of unseemly activities. But when he died in 2011, the floodgates started to open, and it turned out that, with 450 claimed victims, he was probably the most prolific sex offender since the fall of the Roman Empire. By January 2013, they found at least 214 incidents serious (and credible) enough to be labeled as crimes by the police forces, with victims ranging from toddlers to old grannies. Why wasn’t this brought to the police sooner? Well, in many cases, they were, and either they weren’t believed or, in the case that went the furthest in his lifetime, it went like this:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/intera...transcript

Is it really so hard that someone with more money than God and fewer scruples than
Satan, like Trump, managed to avoid the sort of legal trouble Drich expects to happen? If this was just one accusation, it’s reasonable to be skeptical about it, especially if it was actually investigated thoroughly at the time and found lacking, but with Trump, there’s so much shit that it can’t be ignored. At least, if you’re not willing to ignore all the shit he’s done as president that’s even worse.

Before you start to think, well, that was Britain, it can’t happen in America, I leave you with four words, well, two names: Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein.