RE: So what happened?
July 25, 2019 at 1:23 pm
(This post was last modified: July 25, 2019 at 1:29 pm by Drich.)
(July 25, 2019 at 1:13 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Drich, how is your geothermal perpetual motion machine different from the geothermal systems currently being used around the world?
not dependant of thin parts of the or hot spots on the planet. One you can put this anywhere as the hole I am referencing is in the cold tundra of russia. no where near a geothermal vent.
2 Mine is a closed loop system. as already discussed the geothermal site in Ca is an open loop system meaning they capture the steam the steam is forced through a generator turbine and released into the atmosphere. Min again works like a nuclear power plant via cartoon number 2 I recently shared with you again. meaning we recapture all steam/coolant condens it and reuse it again.
This will prevent the problem ca had when their power plants began to loose capacity. it wasn't because the hole was cooling off like so many of you 'good people' seem to think it was because they where running out of natural spring water because there is an open loop which vents the steam to atmosphere. which again we would recapture condense back to water and pump back down to the heat exchanger creating steam again.
(July 25, 2019 at 1:21 pm)Deesse23 Wrote:(July 25, 2019 at 1:08 pm)Drich Wrote: To be a true perpetual motion machine it can not have a fuel source. You f-ing dim wits where muddling around it when you where harping on about the second law of thermal dynamics.. which is why i wanted you to explain what that law was because if you had you would have identified the earths heat as a outside power source which does not fit the definition of a perpetual motion machine.
(July 24, 2019 at 12:27 pm)Deesse23 Wrote: Am i wrong or did this idiot just really claim he has found a perpetual motion machine, and it is geothermal activity fueled by decay of radioactive material below the surface of this planet?
Your right you used the word fueled... that must mean you meant to say fuel is not allowed in the perpetual motion machine... but that not what you said. that is not what your argument was about at all.. you assumed I was trying to tap into a nuclear reaction as you later posts suggest.