(July 25, 2019 at 12:44 pm)Drich Wrote: aren't you supposed to be explaining the second law of thermal dynamics and how it applies to this machine I am purposing?
(July 25, 2019 at 1:08 pm)Drich Wrote: You f-ing dim wits where muddling around it when you where harping on about the second law of thermal dynamics.. which is why i wanted you to explain what that law was because if you had you would have identified the earths heat as a outside power source which does not fit the definition of a perpetual motion machine.
Anyone who has even the remotest understanding of this area knows that it is thermodynamics. Not thermal dynamics.
This was not a typo by Drich. This is clearly what he's heard people say and thinks that this is how its spelt. Which suggests he hasn't read anything on the subject.
(July 25, 2019 at 10:36 am)Drich Wrote: I simply point out if we used a closed loop system there would be no "fuel" and this power station could run fitting the definition of a perpetual motion machine. I gave a couple ideas on how coolant could be used instead of water tapping into more heat but at the same time taking less heat from the hole. via a heat exchanger rather than pumping water down. it would now be in a closed look system..
Again. Closed loop system. Is this what you think people mean when they talk about a closed system in thermodynamics? The two are very different things.
What you are describing is not a closed system.
Clearly you have just heard people talk about this stuff without really understanding what's being said.
