(August 12, 2019 at 10:15 pm)Grandizer Wrote:(August 12, 2019 at 10:12 pm)Acrobat Wrote: Good here is just another way of saying it’s tasty. We acknowledge that meaning of good here is subjective rather that objective. It’s something said about the subject rather than the object. Good expresses something about you, and not the pizza.
This shouldn’t be something that we should be disagreeing on, particularly when we both readily acknowledge that we’re talking about something subjectively good here.
You might not understand what this has to do with the objective goodness of morality just yet, but you shouldn’t be so resistant to acknowledging the nature of a subjective good.
Resistant?
I'm just telling how I see it, lol.
I majored in psychology, so perhaps that has fostered in me the kind of thinking I'm expressing here. I don't see good in the same way you do anyway, so the question really doesn't make sense anyway.
Where is the good? The good isn't really anywhere. It's abstract.
Okay if good isn’t anywhere, then you acknowledge that it’s not in the pizza, it’s not in well-being, or in what’s conducive to well being, perhaps you might say the same of bad as well, that it’s not in anywhere, it’s not in harm.
Is that right?
