RE: Ban Religion - are you for or against it and why?
October 16, 2011 at 10:11 am
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2011 at 10:12 am by thesummerqueen.)
Did the terrorists actually go out and hurt people?
Most churches don't send their minions out to do much more than shout shitty slogans, which just about anyone can do.
Er... so...the rulings when a child dies because of this shit called "child abuse" have absolutely no bearing on you?
Most churches don't send their minions out to do much more than shout shitty slogans, which just about anyone can do.
(October 16, 2011 at 10:10 am)Rhythm Wrote: That court isn't. The vast majority are still protected. You can still hand a kid a rattlesnake and a jar of poison. You can still deny a minor a blood transfusion, christian scientists can still "pray away" sickness just about everywhere else. That case became what it was because they had an actual epidemic of nastiness. They decided that the protections where no longer appropriate given what the religious were doing with them. So have I. Across the board. They have, in effect, banned a hugely important chunk of these peoples religions. In fact, it will be impossible to practice their faith openly now. No one is defending them?
Er... so...the rulings when a child dies because of this shit called "child abuse" have absolutely no bearing on you?
![[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn569%2Fthesummerqueen%2FUntitled2_zpswaosccbr.png)