RE: Saturated Fat Controversy
November 5, 2019 at 8:33 am
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2019 at 8:57 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Yes, if electronics manufacturers were making their products in the us but not selling them on the domestic market, in favor of a better market than the us, that would contribute to people in the us not having electronics. Moot point, since they're not, and everyone exports to the us. This isn't some moral condemnation you have to defend yourself or our current system from..and if it were, invoking trickle down garbage doesn't accomplish that.
Marketing an expensive product is precisely the idea they have.
All food safety and ethics laws are restrictions of economic freedom. It hardly seems to be the case that getting rid of them would produce worse results. Moot point, again, though, since people with no purchasing power have no economic freedom. You're stuck in all of these pages defending your irrelevant political commitments. It's not blame that I'm describing to you. I don't have a problem with the free market or export production. That much should be obvious, what with me being an american operating a business. It's simply a fact that this particular aspect of the free market is a main contributor to global hunger. Like I said, no one is going to convince us to stop eating, or to stop buying food. Similarly, no one is going to convince those exporters to stop making more money. So, we either have to turn a larger percentage of those hungry people into exporters, and help them to market a product with better margins...or we have to help them ramp up production for domestic consumption. These things would grant them purchasing power...aka..."economic freedom".
On to issues of agreement.
1. Not worth it. You'll insist to the end of days that what you have wrong is true..true...true..then bitch about some inane political fantasy as though it established that non-point. All I can tell you is that making food is not politics, and that there are realities of production that are true under any system of government or market organization, and regardless of whatever ideological commitments about any given thing that you may hold. It's impressive to me that your argument for the ethical treatment of livestock depends on arguing against humane practices and against the idea that the animal feels pain.
2. I'm not, so....guess that ones handled. I promote free market solutions tailored to low income people who are interested in ag. This has crossover for people in developing countries..and, some of our projects are directly taken from successful models in developing countries.
3. I suppose that would probably depend on whether or not your life was the quantity about to be reduced in favor of someone else's quality. Ironically, livestock find themselves in this position..so it's probably for the best that they don't have the ability to contemplate the issues that face them, lol.
Marketing an expensive product is precisely the idea they have.
All food safety and ethics laws are restrictions of economic freedom. It hardly seems to be the case that getting rid of them would produce worse results. Moot point, again, though, since people with no purchasing power have no economic freedom. You're stuck in all of these pages defending your irrelevant political commitments. It's not blame that I'm describing to you. I don't have a problem with the free market or export production. That much should be obvious, what with me being an american operating a business. It's simply a fact that this particular aspect of the free market is a main contributor to global hunger. Like I said, no one is going to convince us to stop eating, or to stop buying food. Similarly, no one is going to convince those exporters to stop making more money. So, we either have to turn a larger percentage of those hungry people into exporters, and help them to market a product with better margins...or we have to help them ramp up production for domestic consumption. These things would grant them purchasing power...aka..."economic freedom".
On to issues of agreement.
1. Not worth it. You'll insist to the end of days that what you have wrong is true..true...true..then bitch about some inane political fantasy as though it established that non-point. All I can tell you is that making food is not politics, and that there are realities of production that are true under any system of government or market organization, and regardless of whatever ideological commitments about any given thing that you may hold. It's impressive to me that your argument for the ethical treatment of livestock depends on arguing against humane practices and against the idea that the animal feels pain.
2. I'm not, so....guess that ones handled. I promote free market solutions tailored to low income people who are interested in ag. This has crossover for people in developing countries..and, some of our projects are directly taken from successful models in developing countries.
3. I suppose that would probably depend on whether or not your life was the quantity about to be reduced in favor of someone else's quality. Ironically, livestock find themselves in this position..so it's probably for the best that they don't have the ability to contemplate the issues that face them, lol.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
