(December 5, 2019 at 4:38 pm)EgoDeath Wrote: If Jake came into a courtroom, claiming to have "evidence" that Tom shot Harry, and then when asked about this evidence, Jake revealed that he had a personal revelation where he "saw" Tom shoot Harry, do you think Tom would be convicted? Or would Jake be laughed out of the courtroom?
Let's keep in mind that the police found no evidence of Tom ever owning a gun, and never even found evidence to corroborate that Harry was shot.
Do you think Tom's going to jail?
You just gave me a good excuse for getting out of jury duty next time.