Here is why you should believe in God.

[The Architect Of Fate]

It's surprising you didn't come up with one, and yet throw the child molesting accusation;

I don't know about your definition. Aisha was biologically mature when the marriage is consummated. The present day legal age of marriage is hardly the fine line between what is morally wrong and morally right ,

Mo lusted after her before he married her 

And no this statement is bull 

https://www.islamic-awareness.org/polemics/aishah
(Pro islamic source ) even admits this though engages in whataboutism and historical  relativism

https://www.answeringislam.info/Silas/childbrides.htm

https://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/...ophile.htm

https://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/...escent.htm

Mo was a pedophile end of story, And while it doesn't change whether or not islam is true .It says a great deal about it's followers that they are so willing to bullshit on this .

---

It's true that proofs need a starting point but such starting points are axioms that are so reasonable that they're even more logical than proofs are.

You can prove to yourself that you exist so it's untrue to say that you can't prove that anything exists.

"How can I be sure that I exist?" is not a question worth thinking about.

"How can I be sure that God exists?" is a silly question.

It's untrue that all propositions require further proofs.

It's irrational to require a proof for absolutely everything.

Irrational arguments are also circular.

Axiomatic 'arguments' are just another case of regressive question-begging or circularity.

Axioms are the answer but axiomatic arguments aren't.

Rational axioms are more fundamentally rational than rational arguments are.

Coherent axioms is rationality step 1.

Arguments/proofs is rationality step 2.

It is not the case that one should address the question of God's existence at all once you understand that the concept of God itself presupposes that all belief in the reality of such a God is irrational from the very outset.

The existence of physical laws do not warrant a lawgiver in the sense of a person or agent or supernatural being or intelligence.

Laws do not exist in any way that is separate from the animated stuff that they apply to.

Animated stuff S behaving in a certain way C following laws L are all identical. S = C = L = C = S. All the same thing.

Truth