RE: Cardinal George Pell has conviction overturned
April 16, 2020 at 7:56 am
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2020 at 8:23 am by Agnostico.)
(April 16, 2020 at 5:37 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Yes, he is innocent. 'Innocent', however, is a legal determination. It doesn't mean he didn't do it.
Boru
A defendant is innocent until proven guilty. The High Court ruled that he was not proven to be guilty.
The reasion i know a lot about this case and show interest in it isn't cos im trying to defend the church.
I've shown that by condemning the convicted perpetrators and acknowledging the pedophile scandal of Victoria
My interest comes from the fact that I live in this state and have seen and had to deal with these dirty cops and prosecutors before as well as many friends
I was falsely accused of something which was fabricated by someone in order to get me out of the picture. Cops instantly assume im guilty and laid charges before investigating
Their investigation into my whereabouts through phone records and other means contradicted their allegation yet they went ahead with nothing
All while defending a proper criminal who used them fuck me, the cunt did it fuckin well i'll give him that.
So basically here in Victoria if you don't have at least 15-20 grand for a lawyer ur going to prison. The result, a lot of innocent people up in jail that just couldn't afford a lawyer
And to make it worse the lawyers, at least mine, milk u for as much as they can without caring about weather u win or loose
You pay the lawyer, he pays the prosecutor and/or the judge, you walk. Anyway enough about my beef with Victoria police, point is their corrupt as fuck...
U think George Pell is guilty, right. Why?
Are there any case details that compels you or do u think that he deserves to be punished for continuing to serve as a bishop of a church that has had many pedophiles?
