(April 16, 2020 at 12:44 pm)SUNGULA Wrote:U have your opinion anyway, that's fine like i saidQuote:Of course there are numerous legal counter arguments as to why this position is unacceptable in a court
None i can see that would matter
But here are the legal errors in
"refuse to accept a man in Pell's position knew nothing about what was going on or even participated himself"
1/ It doesn't meet the presumption of innocence standard
2/ It presumes guilt
3/ It doesn't address the charges
4/ It addresses claims that he isn't charged for like "knowing about" it
Just to name a few
These things that are valid in a persons opinion.
Im not too sure of your knowledge of the justice system but but they are compulsory requirements in a court hearing
If even one of these rules aren't adhered to in a court hearing the High court will overturn it.
Quote: Wrote:I was getting bored of arguing against nothing and was thinking about giving u this argument to stand on cos man, u had nothing to stand on
For the people that know the case well and hold this view there are more details within this line of reasoning they refer to supporting evidence that strengthens the position further
SUNGULA Wrote:I don' t buy thisU don't believe. Mate like i said, i know this case inside out cos i live here. These are just some of the argument you could have raised, ok...
1/Here is a quote from George Pell "Abortion is a worse moral scandal than priests sexually abusing young people"
2/ Garald Risdale pleaded guilty to indecently assaulting a total of 53 children. Pell supported him and accompanied him to court.
Pell also moved these priests around whever they asked for it
3/ And i could list another handful of these criminals who all committed these kind of acts under Pells watch while he moved them around
I can easily present your case much greater detail and reference to his career
Anyway SUNman it is what it is, the court has spoken and the man walks free... Peace