RE: God is a Mass Murderer
May 13, 2020 at 6:07 am
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2020 at 6:09 am by Deesse23.)
(May 13, 2020 at 12:50 am)Belacqua Wrote:(May 13, 2020 at 12:24 am)WinterHold Wrote: stop monopolizing science
I post the following list every now and then, just to counter simple-minded people who think that religion is opposed to science. The original is from Wikipedia.
The following is a list of Catholic clergymen in good standing with the church who made significant contributions to math or science. (This list includes only names beginning A through R -- the full list is too long for a single post.) And of course the list of non-clergy Christians who contributed would be far longer.
Quote:
- Deesse23: Bels long list of persons completely irrelevant to MFs original post. I removed the spam, because my reply would exceed the 2^16 character limit
What matters is if you can back up your claim, not if you have addiitonal (unfounded) beliefs/claims. It doenst matter which physical laws were brought up by people who had otherwise silly beliefs (beliefs they could and did not back up).
Thats why Atlass (once again) posted irerlevant BS. It doest matter what other BS (like alchemy) Newton believed in. What mattered is that he could back up his claims about gravity.
This is in acordance with FMs original post, which was about claims and backing them up, not what additonal BS people believe in (and in addition about the necessity that some basic stuff needs to be explained to some people over and over again, and the inability to comprehend whats explained is not on the side of the person doing the explanation. If that was the case all ignorant students could accuse their teachers for their own lack of ability to understand what just had been explained to them).
Quote:If someone claims 1+1=3 there isn't many different ways to explain them that 1+1=2 which is exactly the case when some theist claims his or her god's fairytales are true.
I am not surprised that Atlass failed again. He fails on the most basic logic, reason, history and science, on a very regular basis. I am surprised however someone so well versed in phiilosophy like you didnt know that.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse