(May 30, 2020 at 11:40 pm)brokenreflector Wrote: First explanation. Ultimately, nonbeing produced being. The problem with this explanation should be obvious. How could nonbeing produce being? What would be producing it?You are shifting the burden of proof. Please provide evidence for your assertion, don't ask others to provide evidence for anything else.
So please support your assertion with evidence that some "being" caused the universe, other than your personal incredulity.
(May 30, 2020 at 11:40 pm)brokenreflector Wrote: Nonbeing is the absence of any kind of existence.Rocks exist, but rocks are no beings. That is if I understood your usage of this word correctly. Otherwise please define "being".
I sense a confusion of being with existence on one hand and with " a being" on the other. Please clarify.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse