(May 31, 2020 at 1:33 pm)brokenreflector Wrote:I find it amusing that instead of presenting any evidence at all, you quibble about grammar.(May 31, 2020 at 1:08 pm)possibletarian Wrote: Okay, if that's what you believe Wink
(and it's herds not herd's by the way )
No, I'm pretty sure it's herd's mentality. In other words, the mentality of your herd (a group of pseudo-intellectual atheists). Your herd's mentality. If I were speaking more generally then it'd be herd mentality.
I'm not sure why a guy who doesn't know how to spell courtesy or how periods, commas, and question marks work is suddenly critiquing grammar and typos, but it's hilarious. Are you trolling?
Would that be because you have no evidence? Any chance that is true?
Of course it isn't true. You are quibbling grammar because you know for a fact that you have no evidence, none, nada, rien du tout, fuck all.
If you had any you would have ponied it up by now, but you have not.
If, and that is an enormous if, you had any actual evidence for a god, any god, you would have offered it by now. You have not.
If, and that is an enormous if, you had any actual evidence for your particular god, You would have offered it already. You have not.
If, and that is an enormous if, you had demonstrated that your particular flavour of god was real, would I accept it. Sure, if you had solid evidence. But you have none.
And even then, if I accepted and was convinced that your god was real, I would consider it my moral duty and imperative to kill/destroy the immoral bastard by any means.
You and your imaginary sky fairy can go take an unlikely anatomical excursion.