At work.
No.
That was just one example of one contradiction I regards to one diety concept.
Note that I did mention that there are many and often competing diety claims.
If you've got something better, please post it.
Rather than the reply of rather limited worth.
Cheers.
(June 2, 2020 at 12:39 am)brokenreflector Wrote:(June 2, 2020 at 12:30 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: An Omiscient diety is in opposition/violation of the 'Light speed' law. Such a defintion can not exist within this reality as (Barring rather revolutionary physics discoveries) the speed of photons is the upper limit as to just how fast infromation can progogate across our reality. Hence... nothing can match the defintion of 'Omiscience'.
See, this is why I have trouble taking atheism seriously... Is this really one of the reasons why you don't believe in God? Hahahahaahahahhaahahahhahahahaaah... Wow.
There's like 50 different things wrong with that argument and even if I explained all 50, you still wouldn't learn a thing--or you'd just gloss over it and move to something else.
Atheists are bonkers. That's why I truly believe something emotional is going on.
No.
That was just one example of one contradiction I regards to one diety concept.
Note that I did mention that there are many and often competing diety claims.
If you've got something better, please post it.
Rather than the reply of rather limited worth.
Cheers.
