At work.
I think you meant "Practical" or, perhaps "Passable" maybe even "Palatable" rather than "Probable"?
I'll 'Burn the cheap card of picturing you as ignorant' WHEN you demonstrate the qualities to show that you are NOT ignorant.
As for your morals? Again I can only qualify such by what read here and previously. That myself and others continuesly point out the failings in your posts regarding such issues is telling.
As for you pulling the "But mah faith is 'X'!" card?
I currently work alongside somd wonderful people of various cultural backgrounds who belive a myriad of faiths. Professing to be Muslim amongst them.
We've had quite a few chats together comparing ideas, beliefs and knowledge.
Am I some expert? Fek no. Nothing more than an average 'Joe' whose had a 'Chin wag' with other average Joe's about "Life, the Univers and Everything."
Now perhapse I am remise in not understanding what if is like to live in a place where people can not freely discuss such things? This is certainly true.
Can I question, remark on and otherwise show opinions about religion, whether Muslim, Baptist, Mormon, Baha'i, Methodist or whatever have you?
Yes, yes indeed I can both on this forum and in my free and secular country.
The final comment about my 'Tolerance'?
Your faith is demonstratably fekked.
That people openly professing to worship in the same name as your belief can, have and do regularly commit atrocities is why I call said faith so fekked up.
That the best so far you have seemed to muster is "No true Scott's man" is the telling part.
Now, please, go back and show me where I have gone after YOU and not the faith you profess to believe in.
You acknowledged being ignorant of the finer points of English. It is my self and others who constantly point out the flaws, ignorance, simplicity and plain 'Wrongness' of your positions.
However, you seem to WANT me to start 'Playing the man and not the ball'?
Okay Buttercup, drop your pants and touch your toes. I'll show you just how far the dildo goes.
(July 30, 2020 at 5:01 am)WinterHold Wrote:(July 30, 2020 at 1:58 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Awesome!
We've established it's not a problem of my incoherence but the boundaries of your self admitted ignorance that are the limits between understanding one another.
So, to make better our thinking for us I will use 'Simpler' words and less gramar.
You, WinterHold, knowing about history? Is fekked.
You, WinterHold, knowing about morals? Is fekked.
All these comments are shown by your previous posts in just this thread alone.
So, the better for you to show a better knowing of such things? Maybe use simple sentences?
Of note. My Snark is currently content and safely asleep in the corner after a very large helping of Boojums.
Cheers.
No; use "other words" because the first post was not coherent enough; at least to a non-native English speaker right me, not "grammar" simple words. Burn the cheap card of picturing me as an ignorant; please. and learn to use "other words" because the previous post was a mess.
So, would my morals finally be probable to you if I agreed to every opinion you say, as if I was a parrot?
Didn't you read "Muslim" under my username? that means my religion and morals are quite different from yours. Yes we can have similar morals, but we will also have lots we disagree on.
Your level of "tolerance" though is the standard here. Would you resort to brute force to convert me, or soft power, or discussion, or simply leaving me be?
I think you meant "Practical" or, perhaps "Passable" maybe even "Palatable" rather than "Probable"?
I'll 'Burn the cheap card of picturing you as ignorant' WHEN you demonstrate the qualities to show that you are NOT ignorant.
As for your morals? Again I can only qualify such by what read here and previously. That myself and others continuesly point out the failings in your posts regarding such issues is telling.
As for you pulling the "But mah faith is 'X'!" card?
I currently work alongside somd wonderful people of various cultural backgrounds who belive a myriad of faiths. Professing to be Muslim amongst them.
We've had quite a few chats together comparing ideas, beliefs and knowledge.
Am I some expert? Fek no. Nothing more than an average 'Joe' whose had a 'Chin wag' with other average Joe's about "Life, the Univers and Everything."
Now perhapse I am remise in not understanding what if is like to live in a place where people can not freely discuss such things? This is certainly true.
Can I question, remark on and otherwise show opinions about religion, whether Muslim, Baptist, Mormon, Baha'i, Methodist or whatever have you?
Yes, yes indeed I can both on this forum and in my free and secular country.
The final comment about my 'Tolerance'?
Your faith is demonstratably fekked.
That people openly professing to worship in the same name as your belief can, have and do regularly commit atrocities is why I call said faith so fekked up.
That the best so far you have seemed to muster is "No true Scott's man" is the telling part.
Now, please, go back and show me where I have gone after YOU and not the faith you profess to believe in.
You acknowledged being ignorant of the finer points of English. It is my self and others who constantly point out the flaws, ignorance, simplicity and plain 'Wrongness' of your positions.
However, you seem to WANT me to start 'Playing the man and not the ball'?
Okay Buttercup, drop your pants and touch your toes. I'll show you just how far the dildo goes.