RE: [Remember]: how the Spanish infedels treated Muslims
August 4, 2020 at 7:11 am
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2020 at 7:12 am by Deesse23.)
(August 4, 2020 at 5:45 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote:(August 3, 2020 at 7:10 am)WinterHold Wrote: So as Japan, punishing all the inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for the sins of the imperial army must be thought of considering your argument.
The inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were in the imperial army. Ultimately, that's one of the weaknesses of the sort of full militarization that they (by necessity) were engaged in.
In any case, I'd suggest that the use of atomic weapons was decided more by practical and political metrics than any moral consideration of punishment and sin. If we want to address that dimension, and say that the use of the weapons was, in a moral sense, wrong - and I can see why we'd be interested in doing so - then it would behoove us to premise the statement on more accurate grounds.
The issue within this thread is not how one finally judges Hiroshima. Its yet another complicated issue, and one may come to this or that conclusion after evaluating evey angle of attack.
No, its Atlass black/white good/bad view of the world and people and his pathological need to paint himself and everyone religiously associated with him as whie and everybody else as black.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse