(October 28, 2011 at 10:22 am)Rhythm Wrote: I have a 100% bias towards your idiotic parody of what the christian god must be.
You have a 100 percent bias against Christianity, period. You have stated plainly what you think about it many times.
(October 28, 2011 at 10:22 am)Rhythm Wrote: Great, lets see that evidence.
Right now I am showing evidence that radiometric dating is a very inexact science in response to the supposition that the age of the earth cannot be young.
(October 28, 2011 at 10:22 am)Rhythm Wrote: Because things that don't exist don't have the ability to introduce anything.
The existence of God has already been presumed in the hypothetical. Again, why can't God introduce a new rule into the system?
(October 28, 2011 at 10:22 am)Rhythm Wrote: Figuring out your bullshit doesn't even come close to "figuring it all out". Guess all the muslims, buddhists, etc give weight to their claims as well, or maybe this argument only works for what you believe?
No, but it works against your original argument.
(October 28, 2011 at 10:22 am)Rhythm Wrote: Took a little more than five minutes to get where I am amigo, back to the drawing board. You keep repeating the same tired shit without providing any of the evidence I asked for. If you want to be taken seriously, and if you want me to take your god seriously, and if there is such a god, it shouldn't be so seemingly impossible for you to do this.
I've already told how you can get the evidence. You spend all of your time critisizing Christianity and refuse to do the one thing which could prove it one way or another. That's ignorant behavior. So, it's still on you.
