RE: Another gun discussion part deux.
October 6, 2020 at 2:05 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2020 at 2:20 pm by Rev. Rye.)
(October 6, 2020 at 1:10 am)Nomad Wrote:(October 5, 2020 at 4:55 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Either get rid of that amendment entirely or adhere to it entirely. In other words, make firearm ownership a privilege (not a right), or require every firearm owner to serve in ‘a well-regulated militia’.
Boru
Adopting the Swiss model, the well regulated militia one, would be a good idea. Have everybody in the militia own a gun, but limit access to ammunition to when the member is on active duty. And then have strong regulations on owning additional, non militia related, weapons
Frankly, the second amendment was written for a very different time, one when individual colonies were responsible for their own militia, one when other nations' armies actually invading the US was actually plausible, one when even Alexander Hamilton saw the idea of disciplining a full-time standing Army for the 13 colonies to be "as futile as it is injurious.". Wikipedia lists exactly two foreign attacks on US territory within my lifetime, one the 1993 WTC bombing, and the other 9/11. The first was a handful of Al-Qaeda operatives who didn't need any extraordinary help in being subdued, and the second case... I think that once the hijackers took control, the only real options for taking them out are a United 93-style revolt (which I don't think used guns) or the military shooting it down.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.


