Another gun discussion part deux.

[Drich]

Dam you don't get it Drich.

The world doesn't need  to make more guns. If we suddenly stopped making them, we'd still have plenty for centuries. 

well thats completely untrue. the bann on full automatic weapons that says you can not own one before 1985 proves this. a 1928 thompson sub machine gun/military surplus before the ban went for like 200.00 (grandfather had one because he carried one as an mp in wwii) so he bought one at liggett's drug store paid his 200.00 for it.. the same gun will now run between 8k in serviceable but poor condition to 20k for like new not to mention parts are harder and harder to replace. unique to full auto verse semi.

I am not even saying we can stop makers from making new guns. But we damned sure need the makers to take responsibility for what they make, and where their products end up.

great how do you supposed we do that? now how do you make a law breaking criminal do the same?

What we have now is an attitude of "more is better" and " if you question what we sell, or how much we sell, you are evil."

again current demand by most of your former democrats who never owned one, and fence sitters are the reason there is such a demand for guns. when you guys are not threating to take our guns or put more restrictions on them, manufacturing actually stops for all but the most popular models. threating to regulate guns is what drives the market.

This is fucking nonsense if one is going to rightfully argue, "Just keep them out of the wrong hands", which I agree we should keep them out of the wrong hands, then the key is VETTING at time of purchase. And right now, we have crappy vetting.

please describe what you think the vetting process is, and how it can improve.