You could have made your point without opening the Jesus as myth can of worms. We can talk about the Silence of Paul, the lack of historic evidence, the obvious attempts by Eusebius and others to forge historical evidence, and the confusion among early 2nd century apologists, but we can't offer the inferences as fact.
It's a chicken shit move by the moderator. They wouldn't touch nonsense like "God is love."
It's a chicken shit move by the moderator. They wouldn't touch nonsense like "God is love."