IATTIA,
Logically you have reaced a false conclusion. Here you define sin "A 'sin' is a transgression of your god's law."
then you change teh definition of sin using an Equivocation Fallacy to a sin against your god. The atheists don't believe in a god and if they did most wouldn't believe in the Abrahamic god. If sin is a transgression against the abrahamic God of Christianity then you would indeed be sinning regardless of whether you believed he existed or not.![Big Grin Big Grin](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
As far as kicking back, I'd be more than happy to kick back on enjoy life with you, I do it every day.
Logically you have reaced a false conclusion. Here you define sin "A 'sin' is a transgression of your god's law."
then you change teh definition of sin using an Equivocation Fallacy to a sin against your god. The atheists don't believe in a god and if they did most wouldn't believe in the Abrahamic god. If sin is a transgression against the abrahamic God of Christianity then you would indeed be sinning regardless of whether you believed he existed or not.
![Big Grin Big Grin](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
As far as kicking back, I'd be more than happy to kick back on enjoy life with you, I do it every day.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari