The absurd need for logical proofs for God

[downbeatplumb]

I don't think that's a good comparison you're making there. We're actually talking about the functioning of Hondas whether Honda Motor Co. exists or not. Let's say the latter vanishes from existence just like that, do you think accident will become the new explanation of the [apparent] design of Hondas ?

At this point (probably should have asked this earlier in the thread), I think what we need from you, is how you go about detecting when something is designed, and when it isn't.

Please list the method(s) and steps you use to determine a designed thing from a non designed thing.

This should be fun...

Indeed the designer "argument" is fatuous. It just says "that looks to me like its designed so it is".
There is no attempt to:
show the designer 
where the designer got the stuff
where the designer got the design/building training
show the design process
show the build process

All the while picking holes in what they incorrectly think are problems with evolution.