The absurd need for logical proofs for God

[Simon Moon]

At this point (probably should have asked this earlier in the thread), I think what we need from you, is how you go about detecting when something is designed, and when it isn't.

Please list the method(s) and steps you use to determine a designed thing from a non designed thing.

This should be fun...

Indeed the designer "argument" is fatuous. It just says "that looks to me like its designed so it is".
There is no attempt to:
show the designer 
where the designer got the stuff
where the designer got the design/building training
show the design process
show the build process

All the while picking holes in what they incorrectly think are problems with evolution.

I find it a bit interesting, and possibly telling, that since my post, and your reply, that Klorophyll has been absent from the forum.

Maybe I'm reading too much into his absence, but he has been consistently posting on this thread, up until the time he was asked to provide details on his method for differentiating designed from non-designed things.

Considering this is his thread, seems a bit odd...