(January 27, 2021 at 4:35 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(January 27, 2021 at 4:13 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Maybe because Freddie (note correct spelling) Mercury wasn’t English, Canadian, or Australian. It’s almost unheard of for countries to put foreigners on their currency.
Boru
Technically, he is from Zanzibar and probably would have stayed there if not for the Zanzibar Revolution in 1964, when he and his family fled (he was 17.) That said, during all the time he did anything of note, he lived in the UK, and as far as I can find, never returned even to visit his old stomping grounds. Also, Queen were recently celebrated on a coin from the Royal Mint. That said, it's a £5 coin that isn't in general circulation.
(January 27, 2021 at 4:25 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: -Elizabeth II isn’t the ‘ruler’ Canada or Australia.
-Canada and Australia are both independent, sovereign nations.
-Canada and Australia were never part of ‘England’ to begin with. Look it up.
Boru
Other Brian is actually right about this. Canada and Australia are still part of the Commonwealth of Nations, and, as such, Queen Elizabeth II is still technically a ruler in their government. In practice, their role may be ceremonial, but she's still a ruler, technically. Also, until about 1707, Canada (and their half of what would become the United States) was still officially under the control of England, since the official union of Great Britain didn't really exist until then.
Mercury’s citizenship would make him British, not English. Brian doesn’t seem to grasp the distinction.
Elizabeth is not ‘part of the government’ in any Commonwealth nation - she is a head of state (not a head of government) with a few ceremonial functions. This is a far cry from being a ‘ruler’.
I accept the correction about Canada being part of England.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson