Why Atheism is Incoherent & You Aren't as Smart as You Think You Are

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I am saying that if nature is deterministic, then it can be said to have purpose,

Non sequitur

Got more?  

But atheism has the same problem—how can you explain that natural laws should lead to ever greater progress, towards ever more complex life, if nature is ultimately devoid of meaning or purpose?

Atheism has no problem, because Atheism does not have to explain anything. You however have a problem though: You dont know even what Atheism is, but are asserting that you are way more clever than any atheist around here
Not a particularly smart move from you, id say.

Very much this. Seax doesn't seem to grasp that atheism is a position, not a cosmology. Pantheism, on the other hand, is one of those cosmologies that attempts to explain everything by explaining nothing.

Boru