RE: Random Thoughts
March 16, 2021 at 3:37 am
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2021 at 3:38 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
A really really dumb argument from a right-winger. So let's break this down.
Quote:I can sympathize with people that are in that positionJust not enough sympathy to be inconvenienced
Quote:, but why should the government take from someone elseIt's not taking. It's contributing to the society you are a part of. You are the government.
Quote:to pay for someone else’s poor choices.You're not paying to make sure a child winds up a productive member of society rather than an issue.
Quote: You should rely on your family if you are struggling.So instead of burdening the government, you should burden your family instead

Quote: Government dependency isn’t going to solve the problemYour confusing dependency of simply helping and that's just an assertion.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM