Chauvin Murder Trial

[The Architect Of Fate]

So, you respond to a post about people being emotional by being emotional yourself and providing no argument? What do you specifically take issue with, and why? Provide a real argument please, rather than just emotion and insults.

You posted that women who want justice without physical evidence for a crime (one that quite often does not have physical evidence) are irrational, and then some other stuff about falsely accused men. 
It's not my job to explain to you why that's a disgusting and repugnant statement. 
There is nothing wrong with being emotional, so no need to tone-police me. I have earned the right to be emotional about this topic. (and that does not equate to irrational).

Here response to you is essentially more of the same. Twisted

---

Angry, bitchy, or bratty witnesses don't seem like they change the facts of a murder.  Presumably, all sorts of people get murdered, and all sorts of people are witnesses to that murder or to some material fact.

Yet emotionalism about emotionalism is bad.