(April 5, 2021 at 2:29 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:sorry didn't realize i needed to hold the great boru's hand though my use of the word hate. as discrimination is not synomous nor intrinsically holds any ill will in the simple act of discrimination. A person who understand this term and does not jump the gun understand discrimination is a neutral act. it can be used it identify people in need or the extremely smart among us. it can also be uses as a tool to group like minds together to teach more effectively and or treat a group a certain way. where discrimination becomes a problem is when people use this tool as a means to isolate and hate others. because discrimination is a netural tool it can be used to build up and tear down. only the indoctrinated see discrimination as a tool for only the wicked. in fact this whole thread is about discrimination between religious and non religious people. which in of itself is a non issue, but the follow up to this line of separation is why are religious treated as people who use discrimination as a means to separate and hate? to which i pointed out not all discrimination leads to hate in fact i went so far as to identify the types of discrimination that are tied to hate which are not tools of the church alone.(April 5, 2021 at 1:39 pm)Drich Wrote: i'm sure someone has pointed this out already but just incase..
xenophobiaAs you can see Xenophobia has nothing to do with religion but a fear of strange or foreign people.
- n.
A fear of strangers or foreigners.
- n.
A strong antipathy or aversion to strangers or foreigners.
- n.
a fear of foreigners or strangers
so why isn't religion called religionism meant as a identifier of hate? because religion is not intrinsically hateful. rather in some religions hate can be identified like xenophobia or even racism but the idea of all religion needs to be identified as a form of hate is not an intellectually honest assessment of all religion.
Winterhold mentioned discrimination, not ‘hate’. While there is admittedly some overlap between the two, it’s not reasonably deniable that virtually all religions are inherently discriminatory towards both other religions and the irreligious (some of the neo-pagan loonies and a few others are exceptions).
Even the particular god you worship is capable of both discrimination and hate.
Boru
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 23, 2025, 5:23 pm
Thread Rating:
why not religionism ?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Why, why, why? | Little Rik | 39 | 14889 |
June 14, 2013 at 9:27 am Last Post: Little Rik |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)