(April 16, 2021 at 11:21 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:(April 16, 2021 at 9:40 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Not that Mick hasn't done some good work, but he's blown it big time when analyzing some of these UAP events, and his credibility has definitely taken a hit.
As he did good work in the video I posted by pointing out obvious observations (like that all other light sources are triangle shaped), and unless you have comments on those claims there is no reason to derail the conversation by talking about something else.
Obvious observations? Mick also re-created the gimbal and go fast videos too, and I bet you were calling those obvious observations too before his supposed "debunking" was discredited by people who actually know something about the equipment and camera. Don't be surprised when Mick is called out for mucking things up and using faulty methods and making false assumptions he had no business making about the gimbal camera, etc. I didn't force him to take his pre-determined conclusion and try to force the evidence to fit it. He did that and hurt his own credibility on this subject. He's shown that that is his M.O. on this subject, so people are going to expect that from him now. Yes, he re-created the triangle video. Does that mean that he's correct in his conclusion about this event? Maybe. Maybe not. We certainly shouldn't just jump to declaring him right though, as he's been very wrong about his analysis of other UAP events recently.
