Chauvin Murder Trial

[Angrboda]

Different point of view from what exactly?  What "point of view" were you disagreeing with?   What were you saying that I was contending had changed, and that you disagreed had changed?  Spell it out.  Be specific.  What "assessment" of mine did you disagree with?

Seems pretty obvious.
You think what happened before he was murdered is relevant and Boru doesn’t. Did you really need that to be cleared up? People don’t have to agree with you. It doesn’t mean they’re saying you’re condoning a murder. Are you maybe being a little sensitive about this? Or maybe you’re just looking to pick a fight?

Relevant to what exactly? It's not relevant to some things and relevant to others. Since I hadn't specified, disagreeing that it necessarily wasn't relevant to anything is pure bollocks. Boru was suggesting that I was saying it was relevant in a certain way. Since I didn't specify what relevance it had, Boru was simply constructing a straw man. Effectively suggesting that I had said something I didn't say.