(April 22, 2021 at 7:05 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: You can consider me anything you like, but I'm wondering whether you did or did not suggest those things.Funny enough Carlson Tucker tried pushing the idea that the jury was intimidated into their verdict.
Apparently, I didn't misunderstand you. You did suggest the jury was tainted. Now you suggest conspiracy. Stuff that noise. I think that the jury convicted him because they watched him commit the crimes which he was charged with on tape. You're suggesting that they convicted him because they feared the mob might do something to them otherwise.
So that's one down. Next?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
