(April 22, 2021 at 1:05 pm)Nomad Wrote:(April 22, 2021 at 7:05 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: You can consider me anything you like, but I'm wondering whether you did or did not suggest those things.
Apparently, I didn't misunderstand you. You did suggest the jury was tainted. Now you suggest conspiracy. Stuff that noise. I think that the jury convicted him because they watched him commit the crimes which he was charged with on tape. You're suggesting that they convicted him because they feared the mob might do something to them otherwise.
So that's one down. Next?
Rhetorical question: Why would the violent mob want to hurt the jury if they falsely stated Chauvin was guilty? We saw in January that he's the kind of criminal they look up to.
I meant to say "not guilty" there. Whoops.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home