RE: Chauvin Murder Trial
April 23, 2021 at 6:57 pm
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2021 at 6:58 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(April 23, 2021 at 6:49 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(April 23, 2021 at 6:33 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Really? My take away is that she was going to vote guilty irrespective of personal danger. Like a proper juror, she reached her conclusion based on what was presented at trial.
What’s fairer than that?
Boru
You know exactly what I meant. Stop pretending. If someone in the mob threatens a witness, would you be saying that that is irrelevant since the person says they would have voted the way the mob wanted them to anyways? You like the BLM mob so you're giving them a pass. You don't like the Italian mob so you would not give them a pass.
I’m saying that her voting her conscience is a sign of fairness. If she voted ‘guilty’ only out of fear, that would be unfair.
You can’t accept what she said about her concerns regarding civil unrest and at the same time reject what she said about how she decided her vote. She’s either credible or she isn’t.
And I don’t give organised criminals a pass regardless their national origin or ethnicity, I just don’t view BLM as a criminal organisation.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson