They could make sense.
It is about testosterone, and how long one has to have to "female levels" in order to not give an unfair advantage. In the "natural" case, that woman was in fact genetically a man.
There is a battle between "human rights" in letting transgender (or hermaphrodite) athletes compete, and basic fairness of the sport. I don't know why political wings line up behind one side or the other, but both are important.
It is about testosterone, and how long one has to have to "female levels" in order to not give an unfair advantage. In the "natural" case, that woman was in fact genetically a man.
There is a battle between "human rights" in letting transgender (or hermaphrodite) athletes compete, and basic fairness of the sport. I don't know why political wings line up behind one side or the other, but both are important.