RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 7, 2021 at 8:05 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2021 at 8:18 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Read more about what a category mistake means before you start embarassing yourself.Nah I know what a category mistake is just fine, And that ain't it friend. So kindly shove your baseless condensation up your backside.
![[Image: blush.gif]](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/blush.gif)
The only embarrassment on this forum is you and your deluded attempts to defend make-believe
Pathetic
(September 7, 2021 at 7:57 pm)Jehanne Wrote:Well, his response is because the invisible sock monster is possible. That's good enough(September 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Category mistake: asking for concrete/empirical evidence for the existence of a non-empirical being.
Your request is logically invalid
Show me evidence of the ISM, the Invisible Sock Monster.
Too bad all the things he compares it to are nothing like the ISM
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
