RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 8, 2021 at 4:07 pm
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2021 at 4:07 pm by HappySkeptic.)
Great argument, @Angrboda .
When I was on the Amazon religion forum (before it got shut down), one participant had a thesis that one can never prove the supernatural. If you could, it would be part of the natural.
I argued that one could postulate supernatural aspects from the natural manifestations of Zeus actually doing things and showing himself, but he argued that no, you could only prove the natural aspect of Zeus, and not that there was anything supernatural behind it.
Of course, Kirk solves it in Who Mourns for Adonais?. There's always an "energy source", lol.
When I was on the Amazon religion forum (before it got shut down), one participant had a thesis that one can never prove the supernatural. If you could, it would be part of the natural.
I argued that one could postulate supernatural aspects from the natural manifestations of Zeus actually doing things and showing himself, but he argued that no, you could only prove the natural aspect of Zeus, and not that there was anything supernatural behind it.
Of course, Kirk solves it in Who Mourns for Adonais?. There's always an "energy source", lol.
