(September 16, 2021 at 4:23 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: @Jehanne tried to take the same sophistic path out by suggesting the no boundary proposal, which turned out to be a description of how the universe began. @polymath257 shamelessly tried to find an alternative to classical logic and proposed a defunct interpretation of QM. And it turned out (Flash news) that classical logic actually describes the mathematical structure of QM perfectly well.
What a silly board of sophists.
Well, then, good riddance. But, while you exit the door, here is an essay that you ought to read, at least if you want to understand why many of Us (and, indeed, many to most scientists) are atheists:
Why (Almost All) Cosmologists are Atheists