(September 30, 2021 at 6:40 am)MadJW Wrote:(September 30, 2021 at 5:57 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: If you're over 50, you oughta be able to string together a well-reasoned argument. The fact that you can't worries me.
You complain about insults and other things, but you haven't done a single thing to initiate a substantive conversation.
Hmmmmm!
I was just thinking that about all in your cult...
Not ONE answer to the simplest of questions!
I can just imagine the more complex!
Funny thing is, I've participated in hundreds of substantive discussions with believers concerning Paley's design argument and evolution. This one isn't getting off the ground.
I asked you several questions concerning the subject matter on page one. You failed to provide a coherent answer to any of them. (Notice I didn't say "correct" or "compelling." I said "coherent." That's setting the bar pretty low.) For some answers you gave, I'm not even sure if you were responding to me or just popping off with random sentences. (That's how incoherent the answers were, if they were indeed answers to my questions.)
Glad you aren't 50 years old. Now I'm back to the teenager hypothesis. That's fine. That's way better. We were all teenagers at one point. A 50 year old making the posts you're making is just sad.
But you looking over 50 years of discussions doesn't make sense, either. The internet has only existed in its current form for 30 years, and I SERIOUSLY doubt you studied academic journals or college forums to investigate discussions going back into the 80s and 70s.
If you were the kind of person who performed careful study like that, your posts would look way different.
