RE: That Gay Thread
October 9, 2021 at 2:07 pm
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2021 at 2:08 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(October 8, 2021 at 9:57 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote:(October 8, 2021 at 9:43 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: l think you’d better read it again, lol.
And even if it were the case that the dictionary definition didn’t allow for a difference between sex and gender, does that mean a dictionary definition refutes the current scientific consensus on a subject?
#1...I asked for a reference to a peer reviewed source.
#2... That definition is from Websters dictionary 1828, before the definition was changed to conform to an agenda.
Why would I waste my time on someone, who for one, is not interested in learning anything new that might threaten your currently held beliefs on the subject, and for two, doesn’t value science in the first place, as evidenced by your acceptance of a literal interpretation of the Bible?
Talking donkies, Huggy. Why would I spend my time trying to educate someone who believes in talking donkies? You have access to Google Scholar. Use it.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
