(February 16, 2022 at 8:59 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:We don't let CIS men play with women because they aren't women Trans women are regardless of their biological features(February 16, 2022 at 7:26 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Because that woman is not cheating like trans women are. Let's take Serena Williams for example. Physical freaks of nature like her are great for the sport. Great for ratings. Serena Williams remains a part of the women's leagues because she's not good enough to play with the men.
Quote:If you let trans women play with bio women, by that logic, regular old cis men should also get to go against the bio women, because by your logic, it's not cheating if their bodies are just biologically superior, right?
Right. Why are we even categorizing athletics according to biological sex? Why don’t we group people based on physiological markers that actually refer to the performance of the sport (the way boxers and UFC fighters are classed by weight) rather than a person’s genitalia? Where is the problem here? Your whole objection to mixing genitalia refers back to physiological markers of strength and performance anyway. It kind of seems like you’re making the same argument I am.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
