(November 22, 2011 at 7:30 pm)orogenicman Wrote: Irony: That a creationist would believe that the existence of dinosaur fossils depends on human logic.It doesn’t, but knowing whether they existed or not which is what we are talking about depends on logic.
Quote:You said we agree. Sorry Charlie. We don't.
Agree on what?
Quote:Non-responsive misdirection.
Ok, I will say it simpler. You screwed up the definition of atheism.
Quote:Your posts are direct evidence that you, whatever you may be, exist. Yeah, I know, it sucks, but it is what it is.
No they are not, empirical science is based on direct observation and repeatability, you only have direct observation that my posts exist, not that I exist.
Quote:Any argument for the existence of god is, by definition, based on personal revelation. As such, it is subjective, not objective, and based on deductive reasoning, not inductive reasoning.
Wrong, I reasoned from the particular to the general which is what inductive reasoning is.
Quote: Secondly. your first premise is based on the unsupported assumption that all information originates from a mind. Since there is no emperic evidence to support this assumption, your entire argument collapses.
Wrong again, it’s not an assumption, it’s a rule based upon all observed cases. Information has always been observed to arise from a mind, books, music, and codes. If you have an observed case where information arose devoid of an intelligent mind please present it or the premise stands.
Quote:
I don’t even know who that is a picture of, I said name one.
Quote: Nearly everything you've posted is a bag of lies. Do you honestly think we need to provide you with a list?
Yes or else you are bearing false testimony which is a form of lying. So you have to prove…
1. My statements are false
2. I knew my statements were false at the time I made them
Good luck with that one.