RE: Daily conspiracy
March 24, 2022 at 11:53 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2022 at 11:56 am by LadyForCamus.)
(March 23, 2022 at 6:35 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(March 23, 2022 at 4:21 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: How do you decide who is serious and who isn’t? Their position on some claim? Or do you have some other method?
Track record and whether they appear to be a shill who has no principles. The people I named on the left (journalists and alt-media) are people that from years of watching and reading them, they appear to me to be principled, fairly consistent in those principles no matter which side of the aisle they are covering, and they genuinely appear to buy into what they are saying.
I noticed “evidence” wasn’t anywhere in your answer. Plenty of disingenuous people can and have successfully and convincingly faked being sincere about their beliefs. In fact, that’s one of the pinnacle qualities of an effective con-man. Therefore, the appearance of sincerity is not a consistently reliable method for assessing whether or not someone is telling the truth, or correct in what they’re claiming is true. You’re basically admitting you take people’s word for their claims, which is the same behavior you come here daily and deride us for. So, how come “evidence” isn’t part of your answer? I find that really peculiar.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.