RE: Daily conspiracy
March 30, 2022 at 1:06 pm
(This post was last modified: March 30, 2022 at 1:08 pm by Angrboda.)
(March 20, 2022 at 6:19 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:
Hunter Biden laptop further confirmation. Disinformation campaign and election interference by American intelligence officials and American media and social media confirmed.
Oh, and Nudge, you're losing it dude. Look up Kyle Kulinski. He's not a neo-confederate. He's actually super far left. Don't know why you would have an issue with a lefty like Kyle who was censored right after saying that the election was not rigged against Trump and just for talking about what Trump said, which makes sense to you somehow, but to each their own.
Krystal and Saagar correctly note that the FBI is in possession of a laptop reputed to be Hunter Biden's and that they are investigating. We don't know what their conclusions or suspicions are regarding Hunter Biden or the laptop they have. Regardless, Krystal and Saagar still manage to fill 6 minutes with sheer speculation and innuendo about these facts. That you think the information in this video is worthy of our attention only shows that you are a gullible twat whose only criterion for evaluating a source is whether they tell you what you want to hear. You are an incompetent loser with no critical thinking skills.
(March 21, 2022 at 2:30 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(March 20, 2022 at 11:38 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:
I want to know those things too, but you're doing whataboutism here to cover for how you mindlessly bought into conspiracy theories about the Hunter Biden laptop story being Russian disinfo. You're a conspiracy theorist.
I've searched the forum extensively using the search terms 'Biden', 'laptop', 'Russia', and 'Russian' and find no posts from Fake Messiah which substantiate your accusation. Please quote the relevant post. If my search results are indicative, this suggests that you are nothing but a lying sack of shit.
(March 22, 2022 at 2:36 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Why are you going entirely off topic? Again, no one was talking about Ivanka. Your refusal to answer my question says it all. You are completely ok with election interference if it helps your guy, because you have no principles.
I haven't done any searching on this, nor do I intend to do so, but I have no recollection of Fake Messiah saying that he's "okay" so long as election interference supports his guy. Please provide some evidence of your claim here or I'm going to tentatively hold the obvious inference that this is yet another of your falsehoods.
(March 22, 2022 at 2:36 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: The Biden campaign didn't even come out and deny that the emails were Hunters when the story broke. It was clear from the start that the emails were completely legitimate.
Quote:The vast majority of the data — and most of the nearly 129,000 emails it contained — could not be verified by either of the two security experts who reviewed the data for The Post. Neither found clear evidence of tampering in their examinations, but some of the records that might have helped verify contents were not available for analysis, they said. The Post was able in some instances to find documents from other sources that matched content on the laptop that the experts were not able to assess.
Among the emails verified by Williams and Green were a batch of messages from Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to the board of Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company for which Hunter Biden was a board member. Most of these emails were reminders of board meetings, confirmation of travel, or notifications that his monthly payment had been sent.
Both Green and Williams said the Burisma emails they verified cryptographically were likely to be authentic, but they cautioned that if the company was hacked, it would be possible to fake cryptographic signatures — something much less likely to happen with Google.
One of the verified emails from Pozharskyi, which was the focus of one of the initial stories from the New York Post, was written on April 17, 2015. It thanked Hunter Biden “for inviting me to DC and giving me an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together.”
When the email first emerged in the New York Post about three weeks before the 2020 election, the Biden campaign and Hunter Biden’s lawyer both denied that Pozharskyi had ever met with Joe Biden. Asked recently about the email, the White House pointed to the previous denials, which The Post has examined in detail.
Some other emails on the drive that have been the foundation for previous news reports could not be verified because the messages lacked verifiable cryptographic signatures. One such email was widely described as referring to Joe Biden as “the big guy” and suggesting the elder Biden would receive a cut of a business deal. One of the recipients of that email has vouched publicly for its authenticity but President Biden has denied being involved in any business arrangements.
(Washington Post)
It appears that you are talking out of your ass. The only truly relevant email with any actual implications for Joe Biden, Jr. and your claim of election interference could not be verified as authentic. Do you have any source for any emails which would substantiate your claims of election interference by authenticating a relevant email?
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)