Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 14, 2024, 12:47 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who will be closest regarding what life James Webb finds.
#28
RE: Who will be closest regarding what life James Webb finds.
(May 24, 2022 at 4:39 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(May 23, 2022 at 6:22 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: You should educate yourself.   Nothing recognizably human existed until 3 million years ago.    Each of the major natural global extinction events in earth’s history that came before the current anthropogenic one predate our existence by tens to hundreds of millions of years, and eliminated a higher percentage of species in the biosphere than the most dire projections of the current anthropogenic extinction event.

The animals that survive each global extinction tend to be those with the broad geographic distribution and able to adapt to wide range of environments and subsist on wide range of food sources.   If the extinction event is sudden, ability to go underground helps.  We check all the boxes for traits required of extinction event survivors.  That was not the case with the great auk, the dodo, or the passenger pigeons.   They each checked boxes for species particularly vulnerable to habitats loss or predation. 

I think any extinction event which will wipe us out, as opposed to killing large numbers but leaving numerous viable population of survivors, will likely have to be severe enough to make essentially all the land on earth uninhabitable by any animals larger than a large rat, and prevent all planting and harvesting, or foraging, for several continuous years at least.

You should pay attention to what other people post. I was talking about three specific species, each of which went extinct since the 17th century.

Your obfuscating about global extinction events is both off point and a clumsy attempt to cover up a demonstrably wrong statement.

Boru

I suppose we could wipe ourselves out the picture I just think us going back into another dark ages would be more lightly.
something that intrigued me about the big space program by jim alklele was that most of the goldilocks solar systems in the goldilocks zone of the galaxy are around 1 billion years older than ours. This might mean we are a bit like infants surrounded by wise old men so to speak. If they are out their they might have a lot to teach us and It also might mean less waring planetary youngsters in the region and more evolved life. pure speculation much like the debate on if we will annihilate ourselves something we may not know for sure until it's too late.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Who will be closest regarding what life James Webb finds. - by highdimensionman - May 24, 2022 at 5:06 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Life eating other life. Brian37 42 3939 May 14, 2021 at 4:44 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  quality of life or life for life's sake tackattack 37 3503 November 24, 2018 at 9:29 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  A correction regarding my views on survivors guilt vorlon13 4 816 September 28, 2017 at 7:13 am
Last Post: Brian37
  I need help on info regarding a rare blood disease yasalam 30 6142 February 1, 2017 at 9:34 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Creationist finds fossils, still not convinced zebo-the-fat 16 4870 May 31, 2015 at 11:21 am
Last Post: Worom
  15 Year old Finds New way to Diagnose Cancer AtheistCreed 3 1971 September 27, 2013 at 8:42 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Religion says we're rebelling against God; Science finds differently. TaraJo 29 13883 September 17, 2012 at 4:06 pm
Last Post: jonb
  NASA Finds Amino Acids on Impossible Meteorite, Improves Chances E.T. Exists orogenicman 6 2377 December 19, 2010 at 7:30 pm
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)