(July 17, 2022 at 5:07 pm)Angrboda Wrote: The other level is that it's not always clear what should be considered evidence and what should not be considered evidence.
This is a tricky one, as I fully admit I do not know what evidence would convince me. Certainly if something passes the strict testing conditions of something like the JRF million dollar test, maybe. In terms of religion-based supernatural proof, I actually like something I heard on a podcast recently. The host said he, like I, did not really know what evidence would convince him. However, if god is an omni, he *does* know what would convince me, and has failed to provide that evidence. Therefore, he either does not care about my lack of belief (as, by being omni, he should be able to provide it and knows I would not otherwise be convinced) or, more likely, does not exist at all.
