(November 5, 2022 at 6:55 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(November 5, 2022 at 6:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (Bold mine)
I'd be interested to see how you reconcile those two statements.
Boru
I did judge based on what he said, Boru. I came in with an open mind, and that's all you can really ask for. All of the authors points were ridiculous and the author simply has complete trust in the motives of the government.
The authors main point was basically that there weren't literal documents from the government saying "you better submit to us completely social media companies, or we'll fuck you up good." Well, that generally not how things go in life. When the Mob comes around, they don't have to be so boisterous. A wink and a nod is usually all that's needed for both parties to know what's up.
But first you judge people based on what they say, not who they are. Then, you want to be referred to well-known sources, which is a who-they-are standard.
Which is it?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax