(November 5, 2022 at 11:43 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(November 5, 2022 at 11:08 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: But first you judge people based on what they say, not who they are. Then, you want to be referred to well-known sources, which is a who-they-are standard.
Which is it?
Boru
I addressed this to Helios. I said I take that back and I'm fine with someone I haven't heard of, but please make it someone other than a meme poster who is making the case that there is no reason to mistrust government motives.
And I like how you just nitpicked at the smallest most irrelevant point in my post and ignored all of the substance where I showed how wrong the author was. How about you debunk the Intercept article for me, Boru? I consider you ten times as intelligent as the source that Helios linked me, so you will be fine to do the job. Which of the points from Helios article do you agree with personally? Do you blanket agree with the entire article?
No, I’m not going to debunk that article for you. Apart from the obvious reasons why, I’m just not that interested.
I gleefully accept the charge of nitpicking.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax